Please include more case studies! They're the most interesting part of the course.

I like the read to me audio.

WEB CE is very easy to use!

I thought the exam was tricky, not easy.

Thanks!

duplicate courses are not counted toward fulfillment of annual CE requirements, so new courses need to be added for me to use WEBCE in the future

It seemed like some of the content was more appropriate for the compliance department at a firm vs an individual IAR.

Keep things the way they are.

Very good trainings, thank you!

I had Wil from WebCE help me structure a package to meet all my continuing education requirements he made the experience very pleasant as he was extremely helpful, professional, personable and efficient. A great compliment to the company!!!

While not the fault of the course, being buried in acronyms makes it far more confusing than it should need to be. This is likely a problem of governance, not course structure.

Good course.

More video.

actually the format is very basic in text form. would be better to be more interactive with use of graphics, audio, etc. It's manageable to achieve the objective but boring.

The final exam is too difficult

Thank you!

I thought the exams were horrible . Confusing verbiage.

Please consider re-phrasing the exam questions. Several were 'which of the following are/were NOT..." and utilizing the negative is an extra challenge for some individuals with learning challenges

exam way too hard for 1 credit

i have used WebCE for CE & other courses for many years. I am always satisfied with the content and programs.

There are many grammatical and spelling errors in the content

maybe not your fault but the material was terrible.

This should have been a 3 hour course based on the time to listen to the audio and read additional info and then take the test.

Some of the questions in the exam were confusing and unclear

Logical flow.

great info

QUESTIONS WERE NOT AS CLEAR AS I WOULD HAVE LIKED

The AI generated commentary was very irritating.

Several questions on the final exam were poorly worded. The use of the double-negative to identify an answer that doesn't fit is grammatically challenging and does not necessarily reflect the understanding achieved. A better way of asking these questions: "Which of the following is NOT an acceptable method of non-documentary identity verification" vs "Of the allowable options discussed in this course which of these were not discussed as a method of non-documentary identity verification".

I appreciate the formalities & expect there needs to be a certain amount of vernacular used but please make it more "real world" & better understandable instead of using five dollar words when five cent words will do. I'm not saying to make the content easier, just make it easier for the user to understand what the heck is being said. Sorry but the education system is not getting better which means you must adapt to society or you will not have much use for your services if nobody uses your services because they find it difficult to understand. I'm simply trying to help you succeed with your business model in the world we live in today. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

very redundant with firm element

Incorrectly spelled words are also spoken incorrectly by the narrator

For those not working directly in Compliance, I think a 'lighter' version could give a more abbreviated yet sufficiently informative base of knowledge.

Very interesting topic, thank you

All good. Very pleased and satisfied.

The read-it-to me audio was very difficult to listen to. Person reading had a very mechanical voice. Hard to keep my attention

thank you